Assessment of Biomass Fuel Resource Potential and Utilization in Ethiopia: Sourcing Strategies for Renewable Energies

Dawit Diriba Guta

Abstract


In recent years, there has been renewed interest on renewable biomass based energies. This is due to growing environmental benign, energy security concern and spiraling price of fossil fuel. In the case of poor economies like Ethiopia quality of life and energy consumption are tidily conjoined. This article assessed biomass fuel resource potential of Ethiopia and also investigated strategies for its modern utilization, with particular emphasis on sourcing options for cleaner energies. With proper sourcing strategies, biomass supplies green and cleaner renewable energy for wider human, industrial and transportation services. There is, however, no systematic study on strategies for efficient use of biomass fuel resource in Ethiopia. Abundant and untapped availability, user as well as environmental friendliness, applicability for wider fuel need purposes, competitiveness in terms of cost of production, its rural poverty linkages and multitude of other factors make biomass based fuels prior energy source of Ethiopia. Hence, innovative investment on renewable biomass based fuels (e.g. biogas, bioethanol and biodiesel) and broad distribution of improved fuel stove technologies to rural and urban households, as well as energy conservation technologies for industries and service sector should be promising areas policies of green growth. Hence, developing appropriate institutions and technologies for renewable energies sourcing from biomass is invaluable.

Keywords


renewable energy, sourcing strategies, biomass fuel, resource potential, efficient utilization

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Caputo, M. Palumbo, P. Pelagagge, F. Scacchia, “Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of lo-gistic variablesâ€, Biomass and Bioenergy, science direct, Vol. 28, pp. 35–51, 2005.

A. Sagar, “Alleviating energy poverty for the world’s poor,†Energy Policy, science direct, Vol. 33, pp.1367–72, 2005.

B. Buragohain, P. Mahanta and S. Moholkar, “Bi-omass gasification for decentralized power genera-tion: The Indian perspective,†Renewable and Sus-tainable Energy Reviews, science direct, Vol. 14, pp. 73–92, 2010.

C. Frei, P. Haldi, G. Sarlos, “Dynamic formulation of a top-down and bottom-up merging energy-policy model,†Energy Policy, Science direct, Vol. 31 pp. 1017–1031, 2003.

D. Becker, C. Moseley and C. Lee, “A supply chain analysis framework for assessing state-level forest biomass utilization policies in the United States,†Biomass and bioenergy, science direct, Vol. 35, pp. 1429-1439, 2011.

D. Pillay and E. Da Silva, “Sustainable develop-ment and bioeconomic prosperity in Africa: Bio-fuels and the South African gatewayâ€, African Jour-nal of Biotechnology, Vol. 8, no1, pp. 2397-2408, 2009.

E. Iakovou, A. Karagiannidis, D. Vlachos, A. Toka and A. Malamakis, “Waste biomass-to-energy supply chain management: A critical synthesis", Waste Management, Science direct, vol. 30, pp. 1860–1870, 2010.

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations), “Highlights on wood and charcoal: 2004-2009,†FAO Forestry Department Data source: FAOSTAT-Forest STAT, Vol. 12, January 2011.

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations) 2010 Global forest resources as-sessment, FAO Forestry paper163, 2010

K. Kaygusuz, “Energy services and energy pov-erty for sustainable rural development†Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 936–947.

K. Nath and D. Das, “Hydrogen from Biomass,†Current science, VOL. 85, no. 3, pp. 10, 2003

K. Openshaw, “Biomass energy: Employment generation and its contribution to poverty allevia-tion,†Biomass and bioenergy, Science direct, Vol. 34 (2010): pp. 365–378, 2010

M. Balat and G. Ayar, “Biomass Energy in the World, Use of Biomass and Potential Trends,†En-ergy Sources, Science direct, vol. 27pp. 931-940, 2003.

M. Demirbas, B. Mustafa and H. Balat, “Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development,†Energy Conversion and Management, Science direct, vol. 50 pp.1746–1760, 2009.

M. Hoogwijk, et al., “Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy,†Bio-mass Bioenergy, Science direct, Vol. 25, pp. 119–33, 2003.

P. Adler, S. Del Grosso and W. Parton, “Life-Cycle Assessment of Net Greenhouse-Gas Flux for Bioenergy Cropping Systems,†Ecological Applica-tions, Vol. 17, no 3, pp. 675-691, April 2007.

S. Coulture, S. Garcia and A. Reynaud, “House-hold Energy Choice &Fuel wood consumption: An Econometric Approach to the French Dataâ€. INRA, UMR 356 Economic Forestriere, , France, 2010.

S. Pacala and R. Socolow, “Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies,†Science, vol. 305, pp. 968-972, 2004.

S. Prasertsana, and B. Sajjakulnukit, “Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: Potential, opportuni-ty and barriers,†Renewable Energy, Science direct, vol. 31, pp. 599–610, 2006.

T. Abbasi, “Biomass energy and the environmen-tal impacts associated with its production and utili-zation,†Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re-views, Science direct, vol.14, pp. 919–937, 2010.

U. Mirza, N. Ahmad and T. Majeed, “An over-view of biomass energy utilization in Pakistan,†Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, science direct, vol. 12, pp. 1988–1996, 2008.

Y. Surmen, “The necessity of biomass energy for Turkish economyâ€, Energy Edu. Sci. Technol, vol. 10, pp. 19-26, 2002.

Y. Zheng et al., “Biomass energy utilization in rural areas may contribute to alleviating energy cri-sis and global warming: A case study in a typical agro-village of Shandong, Chinaâ€, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Science direct, vol. 14, pp. 3132–3139, 2010.




DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v2i1.141.g96

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Online ISSN: 1309-0127

Publisher: Gazi University

IJRER is cited in SCOPUS, EBSCO, WEB of SCIENCE (Clarivate Analytics);

IJRER has been cited in Emerging Sources Citation Index from 2016 in web of science.

WEB of SCIENCE between 2020-2022; 

h=30,

Average citation per item=5.73

Impact Factor=(1638+1731+1808)/(189+170+221)=9.24

Category Quartile:Q4