Development of Customized Formulae for Feasibility and Break-Even Analysis of Domestic Solar Water Heater

Auroshis Rout, Sudhansu S Sahoo, Sanju Thomas, Shinu M Varghese

Abstract


In this present paper, individual formulae have been developed to calculate the output variables such as: Discounted Payback Period, Net Present Value, and Benefit-Cost Ratio for a domestic solar water heater. A spread sheet based financial model has been developed and using secondary data from various published sources, these output variables have been calculated. Further for discounted cash flow based break-even analysis, separate formula has been designed for each of six input variables such as water inlet temperature, annual number of days of usage, capital cost, maintenance cost, volume of hot water required and fuel price. In depth sensitivity analysis has been carried out to understand effect of various input variables on above three mentioned output variables. The outcome from financial model, break-even analysis clearly showed that domestic solar water heater is a feasible option for east-coastal region of India. People need to be persuaded about this fact and motivated to invest on it in a large scale. This simple step has far reaching implication to address the energy crisis in present situation.


Keywords


Solar water heater; Sensitivity analysis; Discounted Payback Period; Net Present Value; Benefit cost ratio, DCF Break-even Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


MNRE, Govt. of India. Office Memorandum. http://mnre.gov.in/solarwhin/misl/swhs-subsidy.pdf , 2016 (accessed 10.06.16).

Suntek Energy quotation, Data collected from solar water heater manufacturer.2016.

Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation .Govt. of India, http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/Energy_stats_2015_26mar15.pdf, (accessed 10.09.2016)

SR Allen, GP Hammond, Hammond, HA Harajli, MC Mcmanus, AB Winnett, “Integrated appraisal of a solar hot water systemâ€, Energy, vol. 35, pp. 1351-1362, 2010.

H Cassard, S O Denholm, “Technical and economic performance of residential solar water heating in the United Statesâ€, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 3789-3800, 2011.

MVJJ Suresh, KS Reddy, AK Kolar, “4-E (Energy, Exergy, Environment and Economic) analysis of solar thermal aided coal-fired power plantâ€, Energy for sustainable development, vol. 14, pp. 267-279, 2010.

Y Hang, M Qu, F Zhoa, “Economic and environmental life cycle analysis of solar hot water systems in the United Stateâ€, Energy and Buildings, vol. 45, pp. 181-188, 2012.

G Martinopoulos, G Tsalikis, “Active solar heating systems for energy efficient buildings in Greece: A Technical economic and environmental evaluationâ€, Energy and Buildings, vol. 68, pp. 130-137, 2014.

M Srinivas, “Domestic solar hot water systems: Developments, evaluations and essentials for “viability†with a special reference to Indiaâ€, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 3850-3861, 2011.

S Reddy, JP Painuly, “Diffusion of Renewable energy technologies-barriers and stakeholder’s perspectivesâ€, Renewable Energy, vol. 29, pp. 1431-1447, 2004.

E Borgonov, L Peccati, “The importance of assumptions in investments evaluationâ€, International Journal of production Economics, vol. 101, pp. 298-311, 2006.

DS Remer, AP Nieto, “A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniquesâ€, International Journal of production Economics, vol. 42, pp. 79-96, 1995.

DS Remer, SB Stokdyk, MV Driel, “Survey of project evaluation techniques currently used in industryâ€, International Journal of production Economics, vol. 32, pp. 103-115, 1993.

B Chandrasekhar, TC Kandpal, “Techno-economic evaluation of domestic solar water heating system in Indiaâ€, Renewable Energy, vol. 29, pp. 319-332, 2004.

BT Nguyen, TL Pryor, “Feasibility of solar hot water systems in Vietnamâ€, Renewable Energy, vol. 13, pp. 415-437, 1998.

MM Kablan, “Techno-economic analysis of the Jordanian solar water heating systemâ€, Energy, vol. 29, pp. 1069-1079, 2004.

JK Kaldellis, K El-Samani, P Koronakis, “Feasibility analysis of domestic solar water heating systems in Greeceâ€, Renewable Energy, vol. 30, pp. 659-682, 2005.

K Gillingham, “Economic efficiency of solar hot water policy in New Zealandâ€, Energy policy, vol. 37, pp. 3336-3347, 2009.

F Sahnoune,M Madani, M Zelmat, M Belhamel, “Comparative study between solar and conventional heating-Economic study and environmental impactâ€, Energy Procedia, vol. 50, pp. 841-852, 2014.

SB Reddy, “Electrical vs. solar water heater: A case studyâ€, Energy conversion and Management, vol. 36, pp. 1097-1106, 1995.

A Gautam, S Chamoli , A Kumar , S Singh, “ A review on technical improvements, economic feasibility and world scenario of solar water heating systemâ€, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 68, pp. 541–562, 2017.

HM Abd-ur-Rehman, FA Al-Sulaiman, “Optimum selection of solar water heating (SWH) systems based on their comparative techno-economic feasibility study for the domestic sector of Saudi Arabia†Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 62, pp. 336–349, 2016.

RL Shrivastava, V Kumar, SP Untawale, “Modeling and simulation of solar water heater: A TRNSYS perspective, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 67, pp. 126–143, 2016.

RA Brealey, SC Myers, F Allen, P Mohanty, Principles of Corporate Finance, India: McGraw hill, 8th ed, 2010.

IM Pandey, Financial Management, India: Vikas, 10th ed, 2010.

BH Khan, 2013. Non-Conventional Energy Resources, India: Tata McGraw hill,

nd ed, 2013.

MNRE, Govt. of India. Brief on solar water heating system. http://mnre.gov.in/filemanager/UserFiles/Guidelines_domestic_users_of_swh_cost_systems.pdf, 2016 (accessed 10.09.16)

MNRE, Govt. of India. FAQ on solar water heater. http://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/UserFiles/faq_swh.pdf, 2016 (accessed 10.09.16).




DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v7i1.5263.g7002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Online ISSN: 1309-0127

Publisher: Gazi University

IJRER is cited in SCOPUS, EBSCO, WEB of SCIENCE (Clarivate Analytics);

IJRER has been cited in Emerging Sources Citation Index from 2016 in web of science.

WEB of SCIENCE between 2020-2022; 

h=30,

Average citation per item=5.73

Impact Factor=(1638+1731+1808)/(189+170+221)=9.24

Category Quartile:Q4